Chevy and GMC Duramax Diesel Forum banner

Bilstein 5160 vs. Fox 2.0

33K views 43 replies 21 participants last post by  theJman  
#1 · (Edited)
Not a fan of the soft Rancho shocks that are on truck now. My 35’s make the truck a little bouncy down freeway and uneven roads. Had the 5160’s on my last 2008 for years and liked them a lot. But the Fox’s just stand out and I know are proven to handle harsh conditions. I know Bilstein and the Duramax community have always clicked just looking for feedback thanks.
 
#2 ·
I ran the Bilstein 5100s on my last two 2500s - a 2018 Denali and a 2020 AT4. They were a substantial improvement over the Ranchos.

This time I had considered the Fox 2.0 shocks for my 2021 3500. All my research led me to stick with the Bilstein 5100s though. The Fox 2.0 shocks are more expensive, and I've read a few comments that said something to the effect that it's good the Fox's are rebuildable because they're going to need it.

Also, the Fox 2.0 shocks are better suited for high speed washboard / off-road conditions from what I found. My 2021 3500 will see dirt roads here and there - but nothing the likes that would benefit me to switch to Fox's.

I hope to switch to the Bilstein 5100s in the next couple weeks. Summer is keeping me busy though!
 
#17 ·
I always get a good laugh out of the guys that don’t want to spend a few hundred extra for top of the line stuff for their $80,000 pickup. Pinching pennies on oil filters and shocks and whatnot. Fox shocks are worth the extra dough. I put over 80k miles of towing on rough interstate Highway on a set on my 2014 3500 and they still rode like new when I sold it. Can’t say that about the Bilstein’s on my 08.
 
#6 ·
I just put a set of Fox 2.0 on a 2014 1500 for the GF and they are like magic. I've never had a suspension perform like that and if it didn't seem to require a lift that requires frame cutting I'd have been ordering coilovers for my Duramax right away.

1089191
 
#11 ·
So I have been looking at this type of upgrade after our trip pulling our 5th wheel. I ad installed bags, and the truck just bounced down the road. There were times that i didn't think the truck would recover from the bouncing. I figure the Ranchos got worn out on that trip. Now to just decide if I want the 5160 or 5100. Thoughts?
 
#15 ·
I just replaced the OEM Ranchos and took a drive three miles down the dirt road. I won't call the difference remarkable, but I will call it noticeable. By the way, I have 11,750 miles on the truck and the rear shocks were DOA. Not hard to improve the ride when the originals are dead.
 
#19 ·
What makes you think they were DOA? The Ranchos have little to no pressure in them, they are dampeners not springs. They only work when you push or pull hard and fast. DOA to me means you can grip the body and turn upside down and the piston would fall with gravity or fluid leaked out.
 
#22 ·
That's stock Ranchos...... the 9000s have a gas charge.
 
#24 · (Edited)
I have my sulastics waiting in the box. Just need my buddy's time and his lift to install them.
Honestly, the difference of changing from the crap factory shocks to the Bilsteins have made things significantly better. Also, I'm now running my rear tires at 68 PSI cold. That has helped as well.

Edit, 68 PSI cold in the rear unloaded...
 
#28 ·
Yes, I have a 2019, and yes I'm spying in the 2020 section. 🤪
Yes, the 2019 HD has TPMS, and no, my alert is not on at 68 PSI cold in the rear.
 
#33 ·
I had Rancho's on my lifted 2001 2500hd and they had terrible bumb stear and in hard dips at speed I would almost loose control. Went to the Bilstein 5150s and all my problems disappeared. I suggested the 5100 series to my father for his 2004 2500hd pulling a 5th wheel and he loved them. on my 2007 chev 3500 dually, I will put them on when new shocks needed.
 
#39 ·
Fox shocks are overpriced garbage. I was a dealer that sold them and ran them on our Offroad Buggy. They continually had to be rebuilt and the valving on 4 shocks was different even though they were the same shock. Numerous calls to tech support got us know where. You want a real shock by KING! but for a regular daily driver pickup truck, Bilstein is more then enough and still better than Rancho. People run to Fox because the name they made on motorcycles and now they look all shiny and bling. Ask any motorcycle mech how often shocks get rebuilt the stock internal o-rings are worse than the ones off the ACE hardware Plumbing isle.
 
#42 ·
@Ccdmax7 , it was hinted to earlier, but if you are a "go big or go home" kind of guy, look at King shocks. I don't think you'll find anyone saying anything bad about them.
 
#44 ·
I had 5100's on my Silverado and went with the Fox 2.0 for the Sierra. I have nothing bad to say about the Bilstein's, they do everything very well (much better than the Rancho's for sure). The Fox seem to be a step up though, with even more control. Were they worth the price difference? For me they were, but if cost is a factor than there's certainly no regret to getting the Bilstein's.