Chevy and GMC Duramax Diesel Forum banner

FASS Lift Pump / Opti-Lube XPD Review

9.6K views 13 replies 7 participants last post by  AlbinoRhino  
#1 ·
For my first entry, I wanted to share my experience with FASS lift pumps, and Opti-Lube XPD. I came across these products while researching remedies for the CP4 issue on my 2011 GMC Sierra 3500. (Note: I've had no CP4 problems yet, but aim to prevent them in the future. Truck has 101,000 mi)
Anyway, my hope is to save some of you some of the hassle I've been through, due to the ignorance of some FASS dealers. The FASS website recommends a 100 GPH pump for stock trucks. Despite this, my particular dealer bought me a 165 gph pump, because "bigger is better", right? Well, the pump sounded like a gorilla sucking a slurpee through a giant straw, and it was loud enough that it sounded like the whole set-up was mounted IN the bed of the truck vs beneath it. The installer suggested "I should have it checked out right away!" FASS' take was: "You can run a 165 without issue." (Their own Q&A section says otherwise, QUOTE: "Having a pump that is larger than 150 gph on a stock or slightly modified truck can cause issues. Vehicles that actually need larger units are mainly purpose-built competition vehicles and can handle higher pressures. Along with other competition specific parts, these pumps are going to be much louder. Performance of the motor will produce added pressure which will create more amp draw and lessen the electric motor life.") END QUOTE.
So... Rather than buy a sump, or a draw-straw, because as my original dealer said: "That's what most people do", I ordered a 100 GPH pump motor, and swapped it out with the 165 motor. The difference was night and day... I barely hear the pump, and the performance of the truck is just as awesome as it was with the 165. So, DO get a FASS system, but stick with the 100 GPH version. As my most recent (brilliant) installer told me: "Unless you're racing, or tractor pulling, your truck's never gonna use that much fuel. I don't sell many 165gph pumps".
On the subject of Opti-Lube's XPD formula, (which I purchased based on the lubricity study paid for by diesel forum members, and performed by Southwest Research in TX.) I can say that it seems to work. My truck runs smoother, with no knocking, it's REALLY quiet, in fact. In addition, my gas mileage, since installing the FASS lift pump, and using Opti-Lube XPD (about 3 months ago) has remained improved from about 11-13mpg, to around 17mpg city, and 20 hwy. Yeah, the stuff stinks to high heaven... But it works! (and those are winter numbers in Jackson, WY.) the cheapest/most practical route, is the gallon refill with spout, and the o-ring sealed container with 6 8oz bottles. (I've been refilling mine to about 6 oz, because I don't run my tank to empty.)
 
#9 ·
Fass doesn’t sell the 165 for the GM Duramax anymore without a draw a straw included. To my knowledge that is anyway. As to the Optilube results i can attest to that. I run the XPD in winter and the summer blend yellow label stuff in the summer.
 
#10 ·
My purchase was just a couple of months ago, and i can tell you they do, in fact, sell them without a draw straw... It's an extra $85 for the straw kit, and the two shops I worked with said it "may, or may not solve the problem". That's why I spent the extra cash to downsize the pump ($300), which solved the issue, and works/sounds like it should. It's worth noting, I went to about 3 different diesel shops inquiring about getting that straw kit installed, (which involves dropping the tank, of course), and not surprisingly... No takers.
 
#11 ·
The 11-14 kits don't come with the straw. The 15-16 kits do, for both the 100 and 165, as well as the older 95.

You can either drop the tank or pull the bed. I prefer pulling the bed as I find it's easier. That's how I did mine.

A sump is another option. I opted to use the draw straw instead since I wasn't too fond of cutting a big hole in the bottom of the tank.
 
#13 ·
The 11-14 kits don't come with the straw. The 15-16 kits do, for both the 100 and 165, as well as the older 95.

You can either drop the tank or pull the bed. I prefer pulling the bed as I find it's easier. That's how I did mine.

A sump is another option. I opted to use the draw straw instead since I wasn't too fond of cutting a big hole in the bottom of the tank.
That’s interesting because there is no difference between the model years in that respect unless they made some changes to the unit in the tank.
My purchase was just a couple of months ago, and i can tell you they do, in fact, sell them without a draw straw... It's an extra $85 for the straw kit, and the two shops I worked with said it "may, or may not solve the problem". That's why I spent the extra cash to downsize the pump ($300), which solved the issue, and works/sounds like it should. It's worth noting, I went to about 3 different diesel shops inquiring about getting that straw kit installed, (which involves dropping the tank, of course), and not surprisingly... No takers.
I wonder why the shops refuse to install the straw kits. They aren’t that bad to do. As long as your happy is what matters.
 
#12 ·
I've got a 2011, that explains it. Doesn't make sense... But explains it. At least GM was smart enough to put lift pumps in the latest model year, like every other truck has been doing for decades. I feel like either way I went, (sump/straw/pump exchange) I was gonna spend a similar amount of money. So it just made sense to lower the amount of fuel being circulated, than trying to increase flow capacity for fuel that wasn't being used anyway. changing out the pump was the easiest way to go: $100 labor, 1.5 hours of work.